homepage

SuperSite Blog

Thursday, May 06, 2010

Sorry, But the iPad is Not 'Killing' Netbook Sales


Hopefully by now, most readers of this site understand how the tech world works: Apple releases a successful product (the iPad) but it suddenly becomes The Second Coming (tm). So much so that Fortune's web-based Mac blog, Apple 2.0, has suddenly decided that--get this--the iPad is "killing" the netbook. Only in the reality distortion field could such nonsense pass as truth. Here's the silliness:

Morgan Stanley's Katy Huberty's proprietary research shows ... the impact of the iPad and other tablets on the broader gadget market, starting with netbooks. As her chart shows, sales growth of these low-cost, low-powered computing devices peaked last summer at an astonishing 641% year-over-year growth rate. It fell off a cliff in January and ....

... and these things both happened before the iPad. Just saying. In the case of last summer, when netbook sales peaked, way before the iPad. Before, in fact, we knew what an iPad was. But please, don't let that get in the way of your premise...

... shrank again in April — collateral damage, according to Huberty, from the January introduction and April launch of the iPad.

Sigh.

Here's the thing. Netbook sales growth did slow last summer. (Netbook unit sales are still on the way up.) But it's slowed because of stronger-than-expected sales of larger, full-featured (and more expensive) Windows 7 notebooks, according to IDC, a company that, by the way, actually has a rich history of measuring PC market share. Here's a story about this very fact from The Wall Street Journal, from just last week:

Pricier, more powerful notebook computers are sucking some of the steam from netbooks, the low-priced darlings that helped fuel sales for the PC industry in the past two years.

Many consumers—searching for more computing power than the compact, portable netbooks can deliver—are opting to pay more for laptops with bigger displays and circuitry suited for jobs like manipulating photos and video, which is beyond the capability of most netbooks.

The shift is a sharp reversal of recent buying patterns, when netbooks provided some of the industry's only growth through the recession.

"I think it has taken a lot of folks by surprise," said Brad Brooks, vice president for Windows consumer software marketing at Microsoft Corp.

Microsoft's data—based on unit sales for its operating systems in the first quarter—indicate that laptops in the $550 to $850 range grew faster than the 35% year-over-year growth in overall Windows unit sales to consumers, Mr. Brooks said.

Netbook sales, meanwhile, grew less than 20%, stabilizing at around 12% to 18% of the consumer market in the U.S., Europe and Japan, he said.

However, data from market-researcher NPD suggest netbooks remain extremely popular in the U.S., with sales growing 81% in January compared with the same month in 2009, 73% in February and 48% in March.

Paul Otellini, chief executive of Intel Corp., characterizes both tablet PCs and netbooks as "market expansive," rather than taking sales from conventional portable devices.

And IDC is now forecasting that "mininotebook" (i.e. netbooks and sub-12-inch machines) will sell 45.6 million units in 2011 and 60.3 million in 2013. If I remember the numbers from 2009, they were 10 percent of all PCs, or about 30 million units. Explain again how the iPad will beat that. Please. Even the craziest iPad sales predictions are a small percentage of that.

IDC also says that "the current slowdown is not because of the iPad, it is simply a combination of seasonality and the law of big numbers" and that the company "doen't expect much in the way of iPads stealing way sales from netbooks."

So. Who you gonna believe? An Apple blogger from a web site and a Morgan Stanley employee? Or IDC and The Wall Street Journal.

Right. I knew that. And judging from all the press this stupid Apple 2.0 blog post got today, you're not alone.

Pass the Kool-Aid.


ARTICLE TOOLS


Comments

Add A Comment
  • Posted @ April 16, 2011 08:26 PM by Divebus

    About a year into the iPad, none of the naysayers are looking real smart right now. Every metric shows netbooks dribbling along the bottom of the charts.

  • Posted @ May 07, 2010 04:58 AM by pthurrott

    OK.

    I think we've officially jumped the shark on this one.

    This post is about iPad sales "killing" netbook sales. That's not going to happen. So let's just move on. The iPad and the netbook can co-exist. So should we.

    In other words, let's just give it a rest. Unless someone has something constructive to say about the topic du jour, I think we can consider this one closed.

  • Posted @ May 07, 2010 04:54 AM by ShinyNugget

    Dr. Jackson


    "When your an Apple lemming you can measure success any way you want, so it can make you feel better about spending more money on something exactly the same as something else you could have gotten a lot cheaper."


    What other manufacturer makes a laptop milled from a solid block of aluminum with the same build quality, battery life, and customer service for $1299. Even the entry level $999 machine is milled from a solid block of plastic that makes it dramatically more rigid than most other plastic notebooks. I love the argument that Apple products are overpriced. If you were to do a component by component comparison other manufacturers products cost just as much as Apple when the features are COMPLETELY equal. What other full size laptop has batteries that last up to 9 hours at any price? Yes I can buy a $350-500 laptop from someone else but in general these are not high quality machines that will don't last longer than 2-3 years if that. Most of Dell, Gateway, Acer and other commodity PC manufacturers offerings are poorly built and assembled out of 2nd rate or worse components. This is Microsoft's Achille's heel in my opinion. There are at the mercy of companies operating on razor thin margins selling hardware at the bottom end of the price scale therefore quality suffers. It's the same in any industry you have to pay more for products that are built better and are more enjoyable to use. I get to work no differently in a Kia than a Mercedes. But one is more enjoyable to comfortable and enjoyable to drive than the other. I pay more for kitchen utensils, furniture, clothes and electronics if I get a consummate quality. By and large I don't like bargain bin goods. You get what you pay for!


    Quick question Dr. Jackson. Did Microsoft "care" for their customers when they foisted a poorly engineered and built 1st Gen Xbox360 on the market just to beat Sony to the punch? This was a travesty that should have resulted in massive recalls and in any other consumer product sector it would have. (I own a jasper chipset elite edition by the way. I let others beta test that device for me) Microsoft utterly ignored its production problems solely for the sake of gaining market share. They didn't "care" if gamers (or parents) wasted money on a console that had up to a 50% chance of failing. They wanted to dominate the market and were happy to sell defective hardware to do so. Now tell me they "cared" about anything else.


  • Posted @ May 07, 2010 04:42 AM by panache1023

    Hey Paul...


    How come you haven't posted my remark to Waethorn where I told him that the Courirer is dead?


    Is that false?  I see you have made your own post but the comment I tried to post a few hours ago still hasn't made it up....


    how come?


  • Posted @ May 07, 2010 04:33 AM by Spidubic

    I am still debating getting an iPad when they are released up here in Canada. Main reason is I can read books, magazines, and comics on one device. Plus surf the web while watching TV.


You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here
  © 2012 Penton Media, Inc.